https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328006 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute regarding the nature of goods exported under the EPCG Licence Scheme. Despite initial classification as Silcified Limestone by the Revenue, various reports and evidence, including definitions of Marble and Limestone, mining agreements, and chemical composition similarities, supported the goods being Marble. The Tribunal overturned the Revenue's decision, concluding that the goods were Marble Blocks as declared by the appellants. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the previous order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief. en-us Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328006 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute regarding the nature of goods exported under the EPCG Licence Scheme. Despite initial classification as Silcified Limestone by the Revenue, various reports and evidence, including definitions of Marble and Limestone, mining agreements, and chemical composition similarities, supported the goods being Marble. The Tribunal overturned the Revenue's decision, concluding that the goods were Marble Blocks as declared by the appellants. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the previous order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328006