<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 985 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328004</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC directed the Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the petitioner&#039;s refund application under the applicable Foreign Trade Policy, after granting a hearing and deciding the matter in accordance with law. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of, leaving the refund claim to be examined on its merits under the governing policy framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 985 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328004</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC directed the Director General of Foreign Trade to consider the petitioner&#039;s refund application under the applicable Foreign Trade Policy, after granting a hearing and deciding the matter in accordance with law. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of, leaving the refund claim to be examined on its merits under the governing policy framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>