<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 975 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327994</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 made on a notional basis for service fees, as no income had accrued before April 2008. The disallowance of business loss/expenses of Rs. 1,16,014 became moot following the deletion of the primary addition. The decision emphasized the principle that income should only be recognized when there is a right to receive it, in line with legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 22:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 975 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327994</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 made on a notional basis for service fees, as no income had accrued before April 2008. The disallowance of business loss/expenses of Rs. 1,16,014 became moot following the deletion of the primary addition. The decision emphasized the principle that income should only be recognized when there is a right to receive it, in line with legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>