<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 965 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that payments made to RIICO were for acquiring leasehold rights, not for land use, thus not subject to TDS under Section 194I. Consequently, the imposition of tax liability and interest under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was quashed. The Tribunal also noted a payment amount discrepancy by the ACIT in favor of the assessee. The ACIT&#039;s order imposing TDS and interest was deemed legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 10:31:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 965 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that payments made to RIICO were for acquiring leasehold rights, not for land use, thus not subject to TDS under Section 194I. Consequently, the imposition of tax liability and interest under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was quashed. The Tribunal also noted a payment amount discrepancy by the ACIT in favor of the assessee. The ACIT&#039;s order imposing TDS and interest was deemed legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>