<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 656 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182925</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld a Service Tax demand against a Security Agency, ruling that the taxable service under Section 67 of the Finance Act is the gross amount charged by the agency from clients. The Tribunal reduced the penalty to Rs. 50,000 but affirmed the tax liability of Rs. 12,856.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 18:52:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 656 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182925</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld a Service Tax demand against a Security Agency, ruling that the taxable service under Section 67 of the Finance Act is the gross amount charged by the agency from clients. The Tribunal reduced the penalty to Rs. 50,000 but affirmed the tax liability of Rs. 12,856.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>