https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182922 Section 33(2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was construed to allow an elector to propose or second a nomination unless expressly disqualified, and Government servants were not excluded by that provision alone. Proposing or seconding a nomination paper by a Government servant was not, by itself, a corrupt practice under section 123(8); it would matter only if shown to be part of a wider plan to procure Government assistance for the candidate's election prospects. The election tribunal was also required to decide all pleaded corrupt practice issues and record findings on each charge, and incomplete adjudication justified interference and remittal for fresh determination. en-us Thu, 04 Feb 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 May 2016 17:31:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182922 Section 33(2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was construed to allow an elector to propose or second a nomination unless expressly disqualified, and Government servants were not excluded by that provision alone. Proposing or seconding a nomination paper by a Government servant was not, by itself, a corrupt practice under section 123(8); it would matter only if shown to be part of a wider plan to procure Government assistance for the candidate's election prospects. The election tribunal was also required to decide all pleaded corrupt practice issues and record findings on each charge, and incomplete adjudication justified interference and remittal for fresh determination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Feb 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182922