https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182917 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court's factual valuation of acquired land, holding that the market rate fixed on comparable sale evidence and allowance for the larger block size did not call for correction in an Article 136 appeal. It further held that statutory interest on enhanced compensation under the Land Acquisition Act is a substantive entitlement, not dependent on a separate appeal or valid cross-objections by the claimant. The rejection of the cross-objections as time barred did not defeat that entitlement, and interest was awarded for the relevant period until payment. en-us Thu, 06 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 May 2016 14:55:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182917 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court's factual valuation of acquired land, holding that the market rate fixed on comparable sale evidence and allowance for the larger block size did not call for correction in an Article 136 appeal. It further held that statutory interest on enhanced compensation under the Land Acquisition Act is a substantive entitlement, not dependent on a separate appeal or valid cross-objections by the claimant. The rejection of the cross-objections as time barred did not defeat that entitlement, and interest was awarded for the relevant period until payment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182917