<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 912 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182907</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remanded to the tribunal for further consideration of the assesses&#039; case regarding the computation of expenditure under Sec. 14A of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the tribunal did not consider the effect of the proviso to Sec. 14A in the case of the assessee and opined that if the proviso had been considered, the tribunal&#039;s decision would have been different. The rest of the tribunal&#039;s order was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 12:11:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 912 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182907</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remanded to the tribunal for further consideration of the assesses&#039; case regarding the computation of expenditure under Sec. 14A of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the tribunal did not consider the effect of the proviso to Sec. 14A in the case of the assessee and opined that if the proviso had been considered, the tribunal&#039;s decision would have been different. The rest of the tribunal&#039;s order was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>