https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182905 A voluntary settlement reached through collective bargaining with a recognised majority union was treated as valid and binding on members of a rival union under the Industrial Disputes Act because no evidence showed lack of representative strength, mala fides, fraud, corruption or other improper inducement. The settlement was also upheld as fair, just and reasonable since it had to be assessed as a whole, reflected give-and-take in bargaining, improved wages, and was not rendered unfair merely because some terms were less favourable than the Tribunal's award. It therefore operated in substitution of the award. en-us Wed, 03 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 May 2016 11:22:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182905 A voluntary settlement reached through collective bargaining with a recognised majority union was treated as valid and binding on members of a rival union under the Industrial Disputes Act because no evidence showed lack of representative strength, mala fides, fraud, corruption or other improper inducement. The settlement was also upheld as fair, just and reasonable since it had to be assessed as a whole, reflected give-and-take in bargaining, improved wages, and was not rendered unfair merely because some terms were less favourable than the Tribunal's award. It therefore operated in substitution of the award. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182905