<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1158 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182904</link>
    <description>The penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for non-disclosure of tax perquisites in the original return of income for A.Y. 2003-04 and A.Y. 2004-05 was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. The decisions were based on the assessee&#039;s voluntary disclosure, bonafide explanation, and lack of justification for penalty imposition in both assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 10:52:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1158 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182904</link>
      <description>The penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for non-disclosure of tax perquisites in the original return of income for A.Y. 2003-04 and A.Y. 2004-05 was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. The decisions were based on the assessee&#039;s voluntary disclosure, bonafide explanation, and lack of justification for penalty imposition in both assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>