https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182895 The appeal was dismissed as the penalty imposed was deemed lawful and proper by the Tribunal, based on the facts and circumstances of the case. The penalty of Rs. 4 lakhs was upheld, with the Tribunal concluding that the penalty quantification was not solely based on differential duty but also on other factors. The appellants' argument that the penalty exceeded the scope of the remand order was rejected, as the adjudicating authority found them at fault for wrongly deducting sales tax collected but not remitted to the State Government. en-us Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 May 2016 10:03:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182895 The appeal was dismissed as the penalty imposed was deemed lawful and proper by the Tribunal, based on the facts and circumstances of the case. The penalty of Rs. 4 lakhs was upheld, with the Tribunal concluding that the penalty quantification was not solely based on differential duty but also on other factors. The appellants' argument that the penalty exceeded the scope of the remand order was rejected, as the adjudicating authority found them at fault for wrongly deducting sales tax collected but not remitted to the State Government. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182895