<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs House Agent Penalized for Ivory Import; Commissioner Did Not Justify Violation of CHALR 2004 Rule 13(d), (e), (o).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29370</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty on CHA - Import of Ivory and its articles - Ld. Commissioner has not given reason how the appellant has contravened the aforesaid provision. Therefore, it cannot be alleged that the appellant has not followed the provision of Rule 13(d), (e) and (o) of CHALR, 2004 - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 09:55:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 09:55:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs House Agent Penalized for Ivory Import; Commissioner Did Not Justify Violation of CHALR 2004 Rule 13(d), (e), (o).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29370</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty on CHA - Import of Ivory and its articles - Ld. Commissioner has not given reason how the appellant has contravened the aforesaid provision. Therefore, it cannot be alleged that the appellant has not followed the provision of Rule 13(d), (e) and (o) of CHALR, 2004 - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 09:55:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>