<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 929 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the excise duty refund constituted a capital receipt not liable to tax under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance related to wages, allowing the deduction under section 80IC. The order was pronounced on April 6, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 09:56:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 929 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the excise duty refund constituted a capital receipt not liable to tax under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance related to wages, allowing the deduction under section 80IC. The order was pronounced on April 6, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>