<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 926 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327945</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, restoring the transfer pricing adjustment issue to the Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh adjudication due to administrative issues in providing necessary working for the cost-plus method. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding deemed dividend income, upholding the decision that advances against the sale of properties were not deemed dividends under section 2(22)(e) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 23:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 926 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327945</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, restoring the transfer pricing adjustment issue to the Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh adjudication due to administrative issues in providing necessary working for the cost-plus method. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding deemed dividend income, upholding the decision that advances against the sale of properties were not deemed dividends under section 2(22)(e) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>