<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 917 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327936</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the importer, determining that the imported goods were parts of an injection moulding machine and not complete machines subject to Anti Dumping Duty (ADD). The decision was based on the technical assessment by a Chartered Engineer and the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Customs Tariff Act. The appeals by the importer were successful, while those by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 09:55:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 917 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327936</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the importer, determining that the imported goods were parts of an injection moulding machine and not complete machines subject to Anti Dumping Duty (ADD). The decision was based on the technical assessment by a Chartered Engineer and the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Customs Tariff Act. The appeals by the importer were successful, while those by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>