<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 914 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327933</link>
    <description>Imported goods described in invoices and examination reports as branded LED panels in TV casing, but lacking speakers, remote controls, power cables, motherboard and sockets, did not have the essential characteristics of televisions under tariff interpretation. They were therefore treated as LED panels rather than LED televisions, which were freely importable and did not require BIS registration. On that basis, confiscation and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 914 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327933</link>
      <description>Imported goods described in invoices and examination reports as branded LED panels in TV casing, but lacking speakers, remote controls, power cables, motherboard and sockets, did not have the essential characteristics of televisions under tariff interpretation. They were therefore treated as LED panels rather than LED televisions, which were freely importable and did not require BIS registration. On that basis, confiscation and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>