<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 907 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327926</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the Order-in-Original dated 10th April, 2015, and related actions due to unjustified delays in submitting the inquiry report, violating Regulation 22(5) of CHALR. The Petitioner&#039;s concerns regarding lack of response to representations were noted. The Court emphasized adherence to time limits and directed the renewal of the CHA license without delay. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs, providing relief to the Petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 907 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327926</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the Order-in-Original dated 10th April, 2015, and related actions due to unjustified delays in submitting the inquiry report, violating Regulation 22(5) of CHALR. The Petitioner&#039;s concerns regarding lack of response to representations were noted. The Court emphasized adherence to time limits and directed the renewal of the CHA license without delay. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs, providing relief to the Petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>