<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 900 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327919</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. The Member (Judicial) found a lack of clarity regarding the treatment of Cenvat credit for trading activities before March 31, 2011. The appellant paid the entire amount with interest for the period before March 2011. Given the reasonable cause shown for not reversing the credit attributed to trading activities, the penalty under Section 78 was waived invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 900 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327919</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. The Member (Judicial) found a lack of clarity regarding the treatment of Cenvat credit for trading activities before March 31, 2011. The appellant paid the entire amount with interest for the period before March 2011. Given the reasonable cause shown for not reversing the credit attributed to trading activities, the penalty under Section 78 was waived invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>