<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 894 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327913</link>
    <description>The tribunal denied Cenvat credit on Bura scrap due to lack of actual receipt, imposing duty and interest. Duty on shortage of M.S. Ingots was confirmed. Cenvat credit on furnace oil was allowed despite missing vehicle entries at ICC. Statements lacked evidentiary value, penalties were not imposed, and expert opinion on furnace oil necessity favored the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 894 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327913</link>
      <description>The tribunal denied Cenvat credit on Bura scrap due to lack of actual receipt, imposing duty and interest. Duty on shortage of M.S. Ingots was confirmed. Cenvat credit on furnace oil was allowed despite missing vehicle entries at ICC. Statements lacked evidentiary value, penalties were not imposed, and expert opinion on furnace oil necessity favored the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>