<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 893 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and granting consequential relief for the re-validation of the license in favor of the respondent. The decision was based on the findings that Crude Palm Kernel oil qualifies as an intermediate under the relevant notification and does not require a direct nexus between import and export activities for the benefit of the DFRC scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 893 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and granting consequential relief for the re-validation of the license in favor of the respondent. The decision was based on the findings that Crude Palm Kernel oil qualifies as an intermediate under the relevant notification and does not require a direct nexus between import and export activities for the benefit of the DFRC scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>