<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 765 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182885</link>
    <description>The court held that reassessment after the expiry of four years was not permissible if there was no omission of material in the return. As there was no failure to disclose material, the notice for reassessment was deemed without jurisdiction, rendering the assessment order also without jurisdiction. The petition was allowed, and the impugned notice and order of reassessment were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2016 17:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 765 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182885</link>
      <description>The court held that reassessment after the expiry of four years was not permissible if there was no omission of material in the return. As there was no failure to disclose material, the notice for reassessment was deemed without jurisdiction, rendering the assessment order also without jurisdiction. The petition was allowed, and the impugned notice and order of reassessment were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>