https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182878 Delay in lodging the FIR was treated as satisfactorily explained by the circumstances of the multiple murders and the immediate report after the assailants left; the omission of a specific weapon or detailed role in the FIR was not fatal where the prosecution evidence otherwise supported the occurrence. The eyewitness account, supported by medical evidence, established the presence and participation of the accused, and the trial court's view was found well founded. In an appeal against acquittal, the Supreme Court held that interference was unwarranted where guilt was proved beyond reasonable doubt, and restored the conviction and sentence of the concerned accused while leaving the remaining acquittal undisturbed. en-us Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 May 2016 16:35:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182878 Delay in lodging the FIR was treated as satisfactorily explained by the circumstances of the multiple murders and the immediate report after the assailants left; the omission of a specific weapon or detailed role in the FIR was not fatal where the prosecution evidence otherwise supported the occurrence. The eyewitness account, supported by medical evidence, established the presence and participation of the accused, and the trial court's view was found well founded. In an appeal against acquittal, the Supreme Court held that interference was unwarranted where guilt was proved beyond reasonable doubt, and restored the conviction and sentence of the concerned accused while leaving the remaining acquittal undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182878