<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 960 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182876</link>
    <description>Where seized contraband remained in proved official custody and the forensic report confirmed that the seals were intact and matched the specimen seal, the prosecution case was not undermined by the non-examination of an intermediary witness who handled the sample briefly. The Court treated the witness&#039;s limited role as insufficient, by itself, to create reasonable doubt or support an inference of tampering. On the record, the chain of custody was maintained and the suggestion of sample tampering was not proved or made probable, so the evidence remained trustworthy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2016 16:27:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 960 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182876</link>
      <description>Where seized contraband remained in proved official custody and the forensic report confirmed that the seals were intact and matched the specimen seal, the prosecution case was not undermined by the non-examination of an intermediary witness who handled the sample briefly. The Court treated the witness&#039;s limited role as insufficient, by itself, to create reasonable doubt or support an inference of tampering. On the record, the chain of custody was maintained and the suggestion of sample tampering was not proved or made probable, so the evidence remained trustworthy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>