<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 549 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182870</link>
    <description>Section 42 is not attracted where officers act on routine patrol and recover contraband in a chance encounter without prior specific information; the search and seizure are therefore not vitiated. Section 50 concerns personal search and does not govern recovery from a tanker lorry, so non-compliance with that safeguard does not affect the prosecution case. Sections 52, 55 and 57 are directory and are satisfied by substantial compliance where custody, sealing and forwarding of samples preserve the evidentiary chain. On the evidence, concealment of opium in the vehicle and its use for illegal transport supported conviction under Section 17, and the conviction and sentence were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 549 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182870</link>
      <description>Section 42 is not attracted where officers act on routine patrol and recover contraband in a chance encounter without prior specific information; the search and seizure are therefore not vitiated. Section 50 concerns personal search and does not govern recovery from a tanker lorry, so non-compliance with that safeguard does not affect the prosecution case. Sections 52, 55 and 57 are directory and are satisfied by substantial compliance where custody, sealing and forwarding of samples preserve the evidentiary chain. On the evidence, concealment of opium in the vehicle and its use for illegal transport supported conviction under Section 17, and the conviction and sentence were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>