<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 953 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182867</link>
    <description>A private revision against acquittal does not bar the State&#039;s statutory application for leave to appeal, because revision is a limited, exceptional remedy and dismissal of the complainant&#039;s revision does not extinguish the State&#039;s appellate remedy. When considering leave to appeal against acquittal, the High Court must examine whether the record discloses a prima facie or arguable basis for appellate scrutiny and must give reasons if leave is refused; a brief order merely describing the acquittal as not perverse is insufficient. The refusal of leave was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration without expressing any view on the merits of the acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2023 19:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 953 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182867</link>
      <description>A private revision against acquittal does not bar the State&#039;s statutory application for leave to appeal, because revision is a limited, exceptional remedy and dismissal of the complainant&#039;s revision does not extinguish the State&#039;s appellate remedy. When considering leave to appeal against acquittal, the High Court must examine whether the record discloses a prima facie or arguable basis for appellate scrutiny and must give reasons if leave is refused; a brief order merely describing the acquittal as not perverse is insufficient. The refusal of leave was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration without expressing any view on the merits of the acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>