<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 879 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327898</link>
    <description>In block assessment proceedings, the commentary explains that a delayed return filed close to the assessment deadline may make issuance of notice under section 143(2) impracticable, so non-issuance does not necessarily invalidate the assessment. It also notes that loose sheets seized in search can qualify as relevant documents, and statements recorded under section 132(4) may be used in later proceedings. A subsequent retraction is treated as ineffective where surrounding circumstances, including disclosure of undisclosed income, support the original statement and the seized material. On this analysis, the assessment and additions were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2016 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 879 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327898</link>
      <description>In block assessment proceedings, the commentary explains that a delayed return filed close to the assessment deadline may make issuance of notice under section 143(2) impracticable, so non-issuance does not necessarily invalidate the assessment. It also notes that loose sheets seized in search can qualify as relevant documents, and statements recorded under section 132(4) may be used in later proceedings. A subsequent retraction is treated as ineffective where surrounding circumstances, including disclosure of undisclosed income, support the original statement and the seized material. On this analysis, the assessment and additions were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>