<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 102 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order denying remission of Central Excise duty. The appellant&#039;s contention that the damaged stock of duplex board was unmarketable due to an unavoidable accident was accepted, leading to the decision in their favor. The Tribunal confirmed that the finished goods were destroyed by the fire incident, supporting the appellant&#039;s claim for remission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 102 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order denying remission of Central Excise duty. The appellant&#039;s contention that the damaged stock of duplex board was unmarketable due to an unavoidable accident was accepted, leading to the decision in their favor. The Tribunal confirmed that the finished goods were destroyed by the fire incident, supporting the appellant&#039;s claim for remission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>