<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 595 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182863</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal. It upheld the disallowance of Rs. 11,50,438 for study and training expenses, citing lack of business nexus and personal nature. However, it granted relief by directing the AO to delete the disallowance of Rs. 76,316 for vehicle expenses, and Rs. 22,800 for entertainment expenses, as they were deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 595 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182863</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal. It upheld the disallowance of Rs. 11,50,438 for study and training expenses, citing lack of business nexus and personal nature. However, it granted relief by directing the AO to delete the disallowance of Rs. 76,316 for vehicle expenses, and Rs. 22,800 for entertainment expenses, as they were deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>