<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 865 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment regarding the restriction of depreciation on license fees paid for computer software. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination based on the Special Bench decision, which clarified that computer software qualifies for 60% depreciation. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of applying a functional test to determine the nature of the expenditure and directed the AO to evaluate each software independently to ascertain the appropriate rate of depreciation. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the necessity of adhering to established principles in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 865 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment regarding the restriction of depreciation on license fees paid for computer software. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination based on the Special Bench decision, which clarified that computer software qualifies for 60% depreciation. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of applying a functional test to determine the nature of the expenditure and directed the AO to evaluate each software independently to ascertain the appropriate rate of depreciation. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the necessity of adhering to established principles in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>