https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182840 The proviso to section 4(1) of the Rajasthan City Municipal Appeals (Regulation) Act, 1950 was construed as conferring revisional jurisdiction on the State Government over orders passed by a municipal authority, even where the underlying municipal law made the order final and not appealable. The Court held that the broad wording of the proviso could not be cut down by the preamble or long title, and the operative text had to be given its natural meaning. The High Court was therefore wrong in excluding final municipal orders from the revisional power. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 May 2016 10:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182840 The proviso to section 4(1) of the Rajasthan City Municipal Appeals (Regulation) Act, 1950 was construed as conferring revisional jurisdiction on the State Government over orders passed by a municipal authority, even where the underlying municipal law made the order final and not appealable. The Court held that the broad wording of the proviso could not be cut down by the preamble or long title, and the operative text had to be given its natural meaning. The High Court was therefore wrong in excluding final municipal orders from the revisional power. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182840