https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182831 Under the amended preventive detention scheme, the detention period could not be fixed in the initial order before reference to the Advisory Board. The statute required every detention case to be placed before the Board under section 9, and only after a report of sufficient cause could the Government confirm detention and determine the period under section 11. An order pre-setting detention until a stated date was inconsistent with that procedure and could prejudice the Board's consideration. The detention order was therefore invalid to the extent it fixed the period in advance, and relief was granted to the detainee. en-us Mon, 10 Dec 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 May 2016 15:12:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182831 Under the amended preventive detention scheme, the detention period could not be fixed in the initial order before reference to the Advisory Board. The statute required every detention case to be placed before the Board under section 9, and only after a report of sufficient cause could the Government confirm detention and determine the period under section 11. An order pre-setting detention until a stated date was inconsistent with that procedure and could prejudice the Board's consideration. The detention order was therefore invalid to the extent it fixed the period in advance, and relief was granted to the detainee. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Dec 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182831