<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 566 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182829</link>
    <description>In a review petition arising from a central excise dispute, the SC found no merit in the request for review after examining the petition and connected records. The review petition was dismissed, leaving the earlier decision undisturbed. No further legal principle or substantive clarification is stated in the text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 15:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 566 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182829</link>
      <description>In a review petition arising from a central excise dispute, the SC found no merit in the request for review after examining the petition and connected records. The review petition was dismissed, leaving the earlier decision undisturbed. No further legal principle or substantive clarification is stated in the text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>