https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182827 In a petition for annulment based on antenuptial pregnancy by another person, the Court held that the proceeding required proof beyond reasonable doubt, and that legally admissible admissions and surrounding circumstances could be relied on if there was no realistic basis for collusion. It further held that remitting the matter for additional evidence was unjustified where the existing issues already covered the controversy. On the evidence, the Court found the respondent was pregnant at the time of marriage by someone other than the petitioner and that no disqualifying marital intercourse occurred after discovery, so the marriage was annulled, although one judge dissented on sufficiency of proof. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 May 2016 14:35:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182827 In a petition for annulment based on antenuptial pregnancy by another person, the Court held that the proceeding required proof beyond reasonable doubt, and that legally admissible admissions and surrounding circumstances could be relied on if there was no realistic basis for collusion. It further held that remitting the matter for additional evidence was unjustified where the existing issues already covered the controversy. On the evidence, the Court found the respondent was pregnant at the time of marriage by someone other than the petitioner and that no disqualifying marital intercourse occurred after discovery, so the marriage was annulled, although one judge dissented on sufficiency of proof. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182827