<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 840 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s transparent conduct, timely reversal of a percentage of the value of exempted goods, payment of interest, and compliance with reporting requirements, indicating no intention to evade duty. Compliance and transparency in dealings were highlighted as crucial to avoid penalties for inadvertent errors or omissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 840 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s transparent conduct, timely reversal of a percentage of the value of exempted goods, payment of interest, and compliance with reporting requirements, indicating no intention to evade duty. Compliance and transparency in dealings were highlighted as crucial to avoid penalties for inadvertent errors or omissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>