<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 830 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327849</link>
    <description>The appellant was found guilty of non-compliance with Public Notice No. 17/2012 and held liable for penalties related to Red Sanders smuggling. The penalty on the company was reduced from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 3 lakhs, following a precedent, while the appeal of the sales executive was allowed. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to KYC norms to prevent smuggling activities, highlighting the significance of regulatory compliance and the consequences of non-compliance even for those not directly involved in illegal acts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 830 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327849</link>
      <description>The appellant was found guilty of non-compliance with Public Notice No. 17/2012 and held liable for penalties related to Red Sanders smuggling. The penalty on the company was reduced from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 3 lakhs, following a precedent, while the appeal of the sales executive was allowed. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to KYC norms to prevent smuggling activities, highlighting the significance of regulatory compliance and the consequences of non-compliance even for those not directly involved in illegal acts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>