<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1027 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions totaling Rs. 85,45,000 for unexplained deposits, investment, stamp duty, and cash deposits. The Tribunal found the assessee had provided adequate explanations and documentation for the funds in question, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 13:27:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1027 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions totaling Rs. 85,45,000 for unexplained deposits, investment, stamp duty, and cash deposits. The Tribunal found the assessee had provided adequate explanations and documentation for the funds in question, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>