<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 814 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2009-10, directing the AO to delete disallowances made under sections 14A r.w. Rule 8D, Explanation to section 73, and 40(a)(ia). The judgment highlighted the retrospective application of clarificatory amendments and the correct interpretation of provisions related to exempt income and speculative transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 814 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2009-10, directing the AO to delete disallowances made under sections 14A r.w. Rule 8D, Explanation to section 73, and 40(a)(ia). The judgment highlighted the retrospective application of clarificatory amendments and the correct interpretation of provisions related to exempt income and speculative transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>