<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 811 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance of salary expenses to Rs. 5 lakhs, concluding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance lacked specific evidence of bogus payments. The deletion of Rs. 5,84,071/- disallowance of advertisement expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) was supported, as it was deemed inapplicable to charitable trusts. Most unvouched expenses were allowed by the CIT(A) except for 1/10th of vehicle expenses. The recommendation to withdraw registration under Section 12AA was rejected, as the trust&#039;s income application met the required percentage after adjustments. The Tribunal dismissed both parties&#039; appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 811 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance of salary expenses to Rs. 5 lakhs, concluding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance lacked specific evidence of bogus payments. The deletion of Rs. 5,84,071/- disallowance of advertisement expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) was supported, as it was deemed inapplicable to charitable trusts. Most unvouched expenses were allowed by the CIT(A) except for 1/10th of vehicle expenses. The recommendation to withdraw registration under Section 12AA was rejected, as the trust&#039;s income application met the required percentage after adjustments. The Tribunal dismissed both parties&#039; appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>