<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 94 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3537</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs is available when the inputs are received in the factory under the prescribed declaration procedure, and Rule 57CC applies only if the manufacturer&#039;s own final product is exempt from the whole of duty or chargeable at nil rate at that stage. A later nil-duty clearance of sulphuric acid under a notification conditional on the buyer&#039;s end use did not make the assessee&#039;s product an exempt final product for Rule 57CC purposes. The credit scheme does not allow reversal of validly availed credit merely because a subsequent conditional exemption results in clearance without duty. Rule 57CC therefore did not apply, and reversal of credit was not required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 94 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3537</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs is available when the inputs are received in the factory under the prescribed declaration procedure, and Rule 57CC applies only if the manufacturer&#039;s own final product is exempt from the whole of duty or chargeable at nil rate at that stage. A later nil-duty clearance of sulphuric acid under a notification conditional on the buyer&#039;s end use did not make the assessee&#039;s product an exempt final product for Rule 57CC purposes. The credit scheme does not allow reversal of validly availed credit merely because a subsequent conditional exemption results in clearance without duty. Rule 57CC therefore did not apply, and reversal of credit was not required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>