<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 792 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327811</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal challenging the addition of professional receipts amounting to Rs. 47,37,000 due to nonconciliation with TDS certificates. The Court found that the explanation provided by the Advocate, regarding the nature of practice and receipt of fees directly from clients or through instructing Advocates, was acceptable based on the peculiar facts of the case and prevailing practices in the legal profession. The appeal was deemed not to raise any substantial question of law, and thus, was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 09:51:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 792 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327811</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal challenging the addition of professional receipts amounting to Rs. 47,37,000 due to nonconciliation with TDS certificates. The Court found that the explanation provided by the Advocate, regarding the nature of practice and receipt of fees directly from clients or through instructing Advocates, was acceptable based on the peculiar facts of the case and prevailing practices in the legal profession. The appeal was deemed not to raise any substantial question of law, and thus, was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>