https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182804 The special development statute was treated as valid and enforceable despite the absence of Presidential assent after the deletion of the right to property from the Constitution, and it was held not to be displaced by Parts IX and IX-A. The Bangalore Development Authority's territorial inclusion of the 16 villages was upheld as within the Bangalore Metropolitan Area. The Land Acquisition Act procedure was held inapplicable where the special Act provided its own scheme under sections 15 to 19. The Court found substantial compliance with sanction requirements, but directed reconsideration of arbitrary deletions and exclusions and granted tailored relief to affected landowners. en-us Wed, 05 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182804 The special development statute was treated as valid and enforceable despite the absence of Presidential assent after the deletion of the right to property from the Constitution, and it was held not to be displaced by Parts IX and IX-A. The Bangalore Development Authority's territorial inclusion of the 16 villages was upheld as within the Bangalore Metropolitan Area. The Land Acquisition Act procedure was held inapplicable where the special Act provided its own scheme under sections 15 to 19. The Court found substantial compliance with sanction requirements, but directed reconsideration of arbitrary deletions and exclusions and granted tailored relief to affected landowners. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182804