<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 781 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327800</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed to the extent of remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for quantification of the demand within the normal period of limitation. The penalty imposed on the Respondent was set aside. The cross-objection filed by the Respondent was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 781 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327800</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed to the extent of remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for quantification of the demand within the normal period of limitation. The penalty imposed on the Respondent was set aside. The cross-objection filed by the Respondent was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>