<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 594 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182801</link>
    <description>Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 may extend to acquisitions under Chapter VII of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 where the planning statute does not provide a complete code on compensation and acquisition consequences. The Court noted that earlier decisions had read Land Acquisition Act compensation provisions into similar planning statutes to preserve constitutional validity and avoid discriminatory treatment between landholders. In light of the 1984 amendments, including the award time-limit and enhanced benefits, there was no convincing basis to exclude Section 11A when the Land Acquisition Act is otherwise attracted. The earlier contrary view was treated as requiring reconsideration by a larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 18:08:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 594 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182801</link>
      <description>Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 may extend to acquisitions under Chapter VII of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 where the planning statute does not provide a complete code on compensation and acquisition consequences. The Court noted that earlier decisions had read Land Acquisition Act compensation provisions into similar planning statutes to preserve constitutional validity and avoid discriminatory treatment between landholders. In light of the 1984 amendments, including the award time-limit and enhanced benefits, there was no convincing basis to exclude Section 11A when the Land Acquisition Act is otherwise attracted. The earlier contrary view was treated as requiring reconsideration by a larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>