<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 776 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327795</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to deposit cash security with the authorities within a specified timeframe, emphasizing the importance of financial prudence and protecting public funds. The judgment highlighted the balance between fulfilling obligations and ensuring adequate security measures to prevent financial risks and misuse of public resources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 776 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327795</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to deposit cash security with the authorities within a specified timeframe, emphasizing the importance of financial prudence and protecting public funds. The judgment highlighted the balance between fulfilling obligations and ensuring adequate security measures to prevent financial risks and misuse of public resources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>