<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 521 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182793</link>
    <description>Section 55 read with the Schedule to the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 incorporated the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation framework for housing development acquisitions, and the 1984 amendments on additional amount, solatium and interest were treated as applicable to such acquisitions to avoid unequal compensation and Article 14 difficulty. The Court also upheld the High Court&#039;s valuation of the acquired land at Rs. 73 per sq. yard, accepting the use of comparable sale instances and a one-third deduction for development on a large undeveloped tract adjoining developed areas. The construction of the special acquisition scheme and the market-value assessment were both affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 17:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 521 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182793</link>
      <description>Section 55 read with the Schedule to the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 incorporated the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation framework for housing development acquisitions, and the 1984 amendments on additional amount, solatium and interest were treated as applicable to such acquisitions to avoid unequal compensation and Article 14 difficulty. The Court also upheld the High Court&#039;s valuation of the acquired land at Rs. 73 per sq. yard, accepting the use of comparable sale instances and a one-third deduction for development on a large undeveloped tract adjoining developed areas. The construction of the special acquisition scheme and the market-value assessment were both affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>