<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1233 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182792</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the motion seeking condonation of a 2545-day delay in filing an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) against the CESTAT&#039;s order. The Court noted the lack of explanation for the delay between the Supreme Court&#039;s decision and the appeal&#039;s lodgment, leading to the dismissal of the motion. Consequently, the appeal itself was found not to survive and was disposed of without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 17:07:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1233 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182792</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the motion seeking condonation of a 2545-day delay in filing an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) against the CESTAT&#039;s order. The Court noted the lack of explanation for the delay between the Supreme Court&#039;s decision and the appeal&#039;s lodgment, leading to the dismissal of the motion. Consequently, the appeal itself was found not to survive and was disposed of without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>