<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 753 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, stating that the income surrender was voluntary and not under compulsion. The Tribunal found no concealment of income and dismissed both the department&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. The decision applied mutatis mutandis to a related case, resulting in the dismissal of appeals and cross-objections in that case as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 753 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, stating that the income surrender was voluntary and not under compulsion. The Tribunal found no concealment of income and dismissed both the department&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. The decision applied mutatis mutandis to a related case, resulting in the dismissal of appeals and cross-objections in that case as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>