<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1269 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182788</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the difference between the recorded consideration and the valuation by Stamp Valuation Authorities cannot be treated as undisclosed investment under section 69. Legal fictions like section 50C are limited in scope. The addition was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 16:25:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1269 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182788</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the difference between the recorded consideration and the valuation by Stamp Valuation Authorities cannot be treated as undisclosed investment under section 69. Legal fictions like section 50C are limited in scope. The addition was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>