https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182785 Where the prosecution relies on a handwriting expert's report as the principal link connecting an accused with the offence, the expert should ordinarily be examined so the accused can cross-examine him, unless the report is otherwise validly admitted in law. Reliance on an unproved report may improperly shift the burden to the accused and make the conviction unsafe if the report is the main incriminating material. Section 293(4)(e) of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits use of certain forensic reports, but the report still must be sufficient on the facts and evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. en-us Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 May 2016 15:42:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182785 Where the prosecution relies on a handwriting expert's report as the principal link connecting an accused with the offence, the expert should ordinarily be examined so the accused can cross-examine him, unless the report is otherwise validly admitted in law. Reliance on an unproved report may improperly shift the burden to the accused and make the conviction unsafe if the report is the main incriminating material. Section 293(4)(e) of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits use of certain forensic reports, but the report still must be sufficient on the facts and evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182785