<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 837 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182784</link>
    <description>Bail in serious offences must be supported by recorded prima facie reasons showing consideration of the nature of the accusation, supporting evidence, severity of punishment and the risk of witness interference or tampering. The Court held that while detailed evidence appraisal is unnecessary at the bail stage, the order must still disclose some reasons demonstrating application of mind. A bail order passed without addressing these relevant factors is vitiated by non-application of mind and cannot stand. On that basis, the High Court&#039;s grant of bail was set aside, without any expression on the merits of the underlying case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 15:37:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 837 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182784</link>
      <description>Bail in serious offences must be supported by recorded prima facie reasons showing consideration of the nature of the accusation, supporting evidence, severity of punishment and the risk of witness interference or tampering. The Court held that while detailed evidence appraisal is unnecessary at the bail stage, the order must still disclose some reasons demonstrating application of mind. A bail order passed without addressing these relevant factors is vitiated by non-application of mind and cannot stand. On that basis, the High Court&#039;s grant of bail was set aside, without any expression on the merits of the underlying case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>